You already did, and you made a big deal about how botulism, and not cholera was the leading cause of death over the last 30 years. Yes there have been more botulism deaths than Avian Cholera deaths in the last 30 years, that is factual data....however I have not provided the data on botulism deaths per year, per quarter, per flyway etc yet. Don't get your panties in a wad there Josh, the data is going to disappoint you again....
Like I said, botulism is part of the natural cycle, but that cycle is being driven by several influences, one of them being the use of herbicides in the marsh. Can you point to actual verifiable scientific data that shows that the increased use of herbicides has caused an increase in the number and quantity of botulism cases...NOPE
Regardless of what you come up with, it can not refute the fact that the use of glyphosate and other herbicides have an effect on botulism, and its spread in animals. It is a simple fact. Herbicides are being used in the marsh, waterfowl are dying from botulism, and glyphosate and other herbicides are shown to drive botulism in animals. While correlation is not causation, there is no counter argument that this does not happen, the argument can't honestly be made So according to Dr. Josh with his PhD in Googleology, regardless of the scientific verifiable data that is provable, regardless of what that data says, if Dr. Google doesn't agree with it then the data is meaningless, irrelevant and is only to be discarded.