Utah Wildlife Forum banner

Deer Herds / Guesses on Available Permits?

4963 Views 74 Replies 25 Participants Last post by  Critter
As we approach the opening of the Utah Big Game Application period, I've been pondering of late, especially after the big storm we had a couple of weeks ago about the conditions of the deer herds around the state. I am in the Tooele County area, and there's still some decent wintering ground in the county for the deer herd to get away from the gnarly snow depths of the higher elevations. That said, the deer herd still looks like it continues to decline. After the bad storm a couple of weeks ago, I was driving Hwy 36 south of Tooele and the snow depth was up almost to the shoulders of the deer and they were slowly pushing their way through the snow. Fortunately much at those lower spots has melted away. In other areas, I am just not seeing the numbers that I have historically seen. Kind of sad really!

This has me thinking... How are the deer doing elsewhere? My friend who lives up near Morgan Utah told me he saw the DWR truck in the area the other day overloaded with dead deer carcasses in the bed. How are the deer fairing in southwest Wyoming? I've seen some pictures of the heavy snows there on social media. Pics below are from a few deer I saw in southwest Wyoming mid-January. There was quite a lot of snow then, though most of the deer looked pretty healthy at the time. Hopefully those fat reserves have helped.

I expect the number of available deer permits to be even more reduced this coming hunting season. It will be my 12-year old sons first year hunting. He would like to hunt the LaSal unit if possible (if he can pull a permit)! Anyone in southeastern Utah that has a grip on the conditions there? I also have enough points to pull a Wyoming antelope permit this fall as well. but this heavy winter has me thinking it might be worth waiting another 2-3 years. I have some business in Afton at the end of March. Might have to take a joy ride around to see if those herds look alive still!

Anyone have some thoughts on this?

Snow Deer Fawn Terrestrial animal Elk

Snow Ecoregion Vertebrate Natural environment Mammal

Vertebrate Snow Mammal Elk Terrestrial animal

Snow Deer Elk Fawn Horn
See less See more
4
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5
21 - 40 of 75 Posts
FWIW last year the WB did not change permit numbers for general deer from those recommended. The only ones I see are for LE Elk on a couple of units.

Can they do it? Sure.
I can't imagine anyone's pants are big enough to fit the cajones that would take. Not to mention most of these folks get degrees in wildlife management and pursue the careers they do out of passion for their field. I don't think that often includes a passion for eliminating hunts with such ease. I don't know Director Shirley but I'm guessing the recent decision wasn't made lightly nor would something as profound as closing the deer hunt in Utah.

If he does I hope he has a home on an island somewhere way off the grid
Where is all this optimism coming from!? Madness I say. Madness!

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
I just read that the wildlife board will approve final permit numbers on May 4th. Numbers will be available on utah hunt planner.
Wasn't the idea behind moving the application period back to later this month / thru much of April so that we would know what permits were available? I guess we will know the recommended numbers, but only if unchanged by the board.
The plan all along was only to give people the recommended numbers, not the final numbers, before applying. It's a step in the right direction but still not great, IMO.

But, that was what they advertised all along with this, that you'd simply know the proposed numbers during the application period.


"In Unit 69 near Idaho Falls, 43% mule deer fawns have died. And in Unit 76 along the Wyoming border, 67% of fawns did not survive the region’s severe winter."


Depends on the area. The toughest month for winterkill is usually April. Also have read that they are seeing lots of gelled marrow in the dead - a sign of severe malnutrition and likely occurring in those that have not yet died.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Great info Random Elk... Thanks!
One more point, for next years draw.
I'm guessing we could could see around a 20 percent cut from last year on many units.
Weren't we supposed to know permit numbers before the draw this year?

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
You'll see the proposed permit numbers but not the actual numbers before the draw.
Weren't we supposed to know permit numbers before the draw this year?

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
With the round of RACs starting the first week in April, I bet you see the permit numbers in their meeting materials by the end of next week.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
OK -- after much deliberation, I am going to go ahead and provide my prediction. This prediction will NOT be my pessimistic conspiracy theory prediction that the hunts will just get closed down. It will be a reasonable prediction. Here it goes.....

I think the DWR has learned some things from fisheries management, and has realized that they missed out on an opportunity to SAVE some of our deer population by allow MORE harvest by hunters. Look at fisheries like Minersville. What happens when we have poor water years? We know that large numbers of fish will die due to high temps, low water, stress, etc. So fisheries managers implement regulation changes to allow more harvest. They increase harvest in an effort to lower the population to a point that MORE fish will survive the extreme weather event than would have survived if they continued to protect the fish. Sure, it sounds backwards: harvest more to save more. But it works.

Consider what we've done in the past number of years with deer: with an extended drought and deer herds on decline, we've continued to limit tags in an effort to "save" deer, or ie: stockpile. Great idea, right? Wrong. We've "saved" all these deer only to have the Great Winter of 2023 hit. Reports and numbers are coming in left and right, specifically for Northern Utah (Idaho, Wyoming, etc.) with extremely high mortality rates on deer. This winter is killing them. And we've missed the boat in trying to save them by NOT handing out more deer tags in 2022, 2021, 2020. We should have done exactly what fisheries managers do when bad predictors show up, like extended droughts, and liberalize the limits encouraging MORE harvest in an effort to reduce mass die-offs. Provide opportunity for the reduced population to survive the extreme event. It works -- we've seen this work at Minersville numerous times. We should have done this with our deer herds, but we didn't. Our deer herds are dying from the effects of a bad winter -- and we should have allowed hunters to harvest some of those deer in the previous years leading to this!

So, the prediction on deer tag numbers from me is this:
A. The DWR will propose a SIGNIFICANT DECREASE in tags for northern Utah units.
B. The DWR will propose a SIGNIFICANT INCREASE in tags for southern Utah units.

The increase would include struggling units, like Boulder. Quit trying to stockpile the remaining deer only to have more of them die due to extreme weather. Harvest more in an effort to help more survive the winter.

That's what I think.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 4
OK -- after much deliberation, I am going to go ahead and provide my prediction. This prediction will NOT be my pessimistic conspiracy theory prediction that the hunts will just get closed down. It will be a reasonable prediction. Here it goes.....

I think the DWR has learned some things from fisheries management, and has realized that they missed out on an opportunity to SAVE some of our deer population by allow MORE harvest by hunters. Look at fisheries like Minersville. What happens when we have poor water years? We know that large numbers of fish will die due to high temps, low water, stress, etc. So fisheries managers implement regulation changes to allow more harvest. They increase harvest in an effort to lower the population to a point that MORE fish will survive the extreme weather event than would have survived if they continued to protect the fish. Sure, it sounds backwards: harvest more to save more. But it works.

Consider what we've done in the past number of years with deer: with an extended drought and deer herds on decline, we've continued to limit tags in an effort to "save" deer, or ie: stockpile. Great idea, right? Wrong. We've "saved" all these deer only to have the Great Winter of 2023 hit. Reports and numbers are coming in left and right, specifically for Northern Utah (Idaho, Wyoming, etc.) with extremely high mortality rates on deer. This winter is killing them. And we've missed the boat in trying to save them by NOT handing out more deer tags in 2022, 2021, 2020. We should have done exactly what fisheries managers do when bad predictors show up, like extended droughts, and liberalize the limits encouraging MORE harvest in an effort to reduce mass die-offs. Provide opportunity for the reduced population to survive the extreme event. It works -- we've seen this work at Minersville numerous times. We should have done this with our deer herds, but we didn't. Our deer herds are dying from the effects of a bad winter -- and we should have allowed hunters to harvest some of those deer in the previous years leading to this!

So, the prediction on deer tag numbers from me is this:
A. The DWR will propose a SIGNIFICANT DECREASE in tags for northern Utah units.
B. The DWR will propose a SIGNIFICANT INCREASE in tags for southern Utah units.

The increase would include struggling units, like Boulder. Quit trying to stockpile the remaining deer only to have more of them die due to extreme weather. Harvest more in an effort to help more survive the winter.

That's what I think.
I agree, for general units. On LE units, I doubt they will follow the same idea.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I agree, for general units. On LE units, I doubt they will follow the same idea.
I think the Henries and Pauns are just as vulnerable to mass die-off from harsh weather events as any unit in northern Utah -- so, why attempt to stockpile (ie: protect) animals only to have them die due to those harsh weather events? increase tag allocation even for LE units. That's my prediction.
Fish management is not the same a big game management, I don't think the biologist are trying to stock pile the deer. Maybe special interest groups are. We have just gone through 2 to 3 years of extreme weather event (drought) and then this winter. I think they will give numbers based on carry capacity of the given habitat with the knowledge that we have. And yes northern units less tags southern more tags
I think the Henries and Pauns are just as vulnerable to mass die-off from harsh weather events as any unit in northern Utah -- so, why attempt to stockpile (ie: protect) animals only to have them die due to those harsh weather events? increase tag allocation even for LE units. That's my prediction.
Because they are having a hard enough time producing bucks worth the 28 year wait for the tag as it is. If you kill more every year, it gets even harder.
Because they are having a hard enough time producing bucks worth the 28 year wait for the tag as it is. If you kill more every year, it gets even harder.
so you're saying that we should reduce tags and stockpile those deer? heck, why not just close the unit to hunting for 3 years?

(FWIW, neither of those options above will fix the problem)

It's just my prediction. I think they'll propose to increase across the board for units in southern Utah.
I think the DWR has learned some things from fisheries management, and has realized that they missed out on an opportunity to SAVE some of our deer population by allow MORE harvest by hunters. Look at fisheries like Minersville. What happens when we have poor water years? We know that large numbers of fish will die due to high temps, low water, stress, etc. So fisheries managers implement regulation changes to allow more harvest. They increase harvest in an effort to lower the population to a point that MORE fish will survive the extreme weather event than would have survived if they continued to protect the fish. Sure, it sounds backwards: harvest more to save more. But it works.
If only the DWR could back up the hatchery truck into a depopulated and newly filled/rejuvenated Henries or Pauns and have 170 bucks after 2 years, like what we see with Minersville rainbows. :unsure:

Couple other quick thoughts.

1. They actually did this with Henries Bison a couple years ago when the Wayne county ranchers were freaking out about how bad the range conditions were.

2. SFW and their minions on the WB would absolutely lose their minds with such an approach. While it may be entertaining to watch, it is pretty unlikely to happen with the kings deer.
If only the DWR could back up the hatchery truck into a depopulated and newly filled/rejuvenated Henries or Pauns and have 170 bucks after 2 years, like what we see with Minersville rainbows. :unsure:
This is exactly correct -- unlike with fish, we can't simply stock more deer from hatcheries. but, I think the concept is still legit. Had we increased tags in northern Utah in 2022 (2021, 2020) and reduced the size of the herds in those units, would our mortality rate today, and in the coming months, be at 70%? Or would it be lower? Also, you have to consider that the deer today are dying - regardless of what we did yesterday. So, why not allow hunters to harvest those deer anyway?

I know. I'm crazy. But we can't keep trying to save deer only to have them die anyway. Let's harvest them.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
21 - 40 of 75 Posts
Top