Joined
·
3,213 Posts
Maybe I should put this in the "ETHICS" section, but I guess this could fit here too. I am sure that most of us have heard about the incident from the football game the other night where the coach stomped on that pheasant that kids released onto the field. I have read several comments from animal rights activists who think the man should be charged with a felony for his actions as they see it as animal cruelty. I think it is unfortunate what happened. The guy most certainly did the wrong thing. He says he was trying to "pin it down by stepping on it, but lost his balance", but in my opinion he looked like a little sissy trying to kill the thing before it "pecked him to death." Why wouldn't he just reach down and try to catch it? That's what I would do! Instead he nearly stomps the thing to death and has an animal cruelty charge to deal with, and thousands of PETA and humane society followers on his butt. It got me thinking, yeah, getting stomped on isn't a pretty way to go, but what would people say about how us sportsmen who ring necks to dispatch winged birds? Is that any better? Fact of the matter is, its something that needs to be done to put the bird out, and end it's suffering. Obviously we shoot to kill, but in the circumstance where a clean kill didn't happen are we being inhumane in how we euthanize birds? I think ringing necks is a humane thing to do, as it puts an end to suffering. So then we go to the animal rights opinion that we shouldn't hunt at all because animals MIGHT suffer. So what kind of reaction do you have to this? Does a line need to be drawn? If so, where?
P.S. I'm sure this could get touchy, so let's keep it civil.
P.S. I'm sure this could get touchy, so let's keep it civil.