And yet the BLM and Forest service are the ones who won't listen.I agree Fin, so Bishops solution to public lands, is to exclude the public from here on out. Only those who play the backdoor deal games get a say. There's a meeting in St. George Friday over the BLMs management plans for the district, speaking at the meeting is by invitation only. Tell me again how the BLM and Forest Service doesn't listen to public input Mr. Bishop.Okay...burp...I think I've got it.
The governor will appoint a commission including one sportsmen rep to determine what will happen to the Bookcliffs. We know how gubernatorial appointments work. No? Look at your Wildlife Board.
I've found a bunch of crap to get worried about. But bottom line is that Bishop has indeed found a way to end the bickering - y'all shut up! PLI provides for no public input ever again. Well, unless you count your sportsmen's rep...whoever might that be?
Move then. Public land in Virginia to hunt those five months is non existent. Sure, for real cheap you can hunt half the year and have twenty deer tags, but good luck finding a spot to hunt them freely as we do in the West. Under Bishops plan, you can forget having ANY say in how wildlife is managed on certain lands because it isn't properly addressed. Like anything, he's setting up the system of management that works to fail so that he can pat the likes of Don Peay on the back with access to "special management areas". Prepare for tag prices to skyrocket in order to fund the division and you complain about kitty cat populations now? Try managing that with swaths of SITLA and private land owners.Just like Virginia?
So we're going to get 5 months of deer hunting and can harvest several deer a piece for just a few dollars?
Will this mean we can stop blaming all of wildlife's wows on weather and habitat? And SFW?
Sign me up.
Well lookie there. You're right. More diarrhea of the mouth from Bishop and Stewart, not to mention Alan Gardner whom I've lost any and all respect for. I have to work, or I would personally go just to be that "one guy" who has no problem openly and vocally voicing opposition to their "plan". Having read the entire PLI, NO THANK YOU!!!!Well there's another one tomorrow, and it looks to be just your standard Utah right wing bash the BLM party:
I've spoken to Gardner. He tried to use the "green decoy" smear when I brought up all the sportsmen groups that oppose the land transfer. He had no beneficial information, facts, or arguments that would satisfy anyone with a brain. I honestly couldn't believe some of his defenses...................... As for being that one guy, speaking is by invitation only klbzdad. I just can't believe their hypocrisy, they only want to hear their side of the argument to further their egos, then they say the BLM doesn't listen to anyone and is tyrannical. I believe censoring speakers to those only in agreement with your argument and silencing everyone else is tyrannical.Well lookie there. You're right. More diarrhea of the mouth from Bishop and Stewart, not to mention Alan Gardner whom I've lost any and all respect for. I have to work, or I would personally go just to be that "one guy" who has no problem openly and vocally voicing opposition to their "plan". Having read the entire PLI, NO THANK YOU!!!!