Utah’s system is the best, most fair system out of all the systems.
Utah’s system is the best, most fair system out of all the systems.Utah has a good point system. Half tags to points, half to random. Wait long enough and you can draw something guaranteed or you get lucky before that time. Full random ya might never draw.
Sounds to me is she is so busy you now have 11 points to use for you!Yeah, I've been seeing guys in the know talking about the LE muzzleloader elk hunt being the primo hunt for awhile. The early rifle hunt usually falls just a little earlier than ideal, and then the muzzy guys get the best rutting and bugling action all while drawing the tag with less points. My wife is currently in a great position to draw a top unit for muzzleloader with her 20 something (22 maybe?) elk points. Every year she just wants to do a bonus point because we are so "busy" apparently. I guarantee if I was the one with the pile of points we would somehow find the time.
I am not one of the lucky ones to hold an LL.You are arguing for something that has no bearing on my criticism. For some there was an opportunity, those from 1984 to 1994. For 28 full years since then others didn't have that opportunity. That's inherently inequitable. Sorry, there is no argument against that fact.
Once the last lifetime holder dies that criticism will become moot. For perspective, that should happen after I die. But if any parent was wise enough to buy their child one the final year it was offered this program will have an impact for decades to come.
Just to be clear, and you can go back to post #16 to confirm, I said ‘most’ fair of the systems.Nothing in your post effectively criticizes any points I actually initially said , and have now clarified multiple times. In fact, you'll notice I already pointed out full random draw has "downstream effects". I've also stated similar to you, that fairness is contextual and often involves sacrificing one quality, like equity in draws, for another, like equity in outcomes, like actually being able to hunt a certain number of times in ones lifetime.
It sounds like your criticism is actually against the exact same thing I'm criticizing, ie the system is "fair" as stated by Shane. On that we agree. We just got there via different paths.
*And guaranteed LL tags will always impact current and future user successful tag odds as long as they exist in the user pool. It therefore disadvantages current and future hunters without them until it is no longer a variable. May that last person live long and enjoy hunting as long as they desire because the error was on the part of the state, not that individual or their wise family members who got it for them.
Hunter Tom,I don't think that DWR had the right to sell future hunting rights for temporary gain. They saddled game managers for as much as 80 or so years with that ignorant decision. What if the IRS said they have a money problem and offered lifetime tax exemption. Or troubled Sherriff agencies sold lifetime get out of jail cards to solve a temporary fiscal shortage, DWR should void the LL obligation and buy out remaining LL holders.
Gosh I hope you are right.Not just a Utah thing. Colorado and Wyoming have both seen the same uptick in applications. Seems like there was a sudden renewed interest in the outdoors and hunting. Maybe after a few years of fighting for tags and learning hunting is harder than it looks, some will give up. But so far, it appears to be here to stay.