Pretty strong statement. Hunterst concerned about the future of their state and hunts are worse than "Obama and his lib army." Pretty close minded thought
Pretty strong statement. Hunterst concerned about the future of their state and hunts are worse than "Obama and his lib army." Pretty close minded thoughtsome of you really crack me up, with the new scope regs. i thought that obama and his lib army were bad. but the people around here are much worse.
I was getting near the top of the LE elk pool for a unit we have family property on that has alot of bulls. I honestly think this will add on another 5 years to my wait. I also think Gen ML deer for my unit which has been nearly guarenteed draw will slip to every other year.DallanC,
What is your definition of 'through the roof' on the LE elk hunts? I think we'll see a little bit of a shift the first couple years, but I don't anticipate it to be significant.
Why don't you just openly announce which general unit your hunting deer in and then you will still be able to draw it because we all know how bad that unit sucks, with too many hunters and very few bucks.;-)I was getting near the top of the LE elk pool for a unit we have family property on that has alot of bulls. I honestly think this will add on another 5 years to my wait. I also think Gen ML deer for my unit which has been nearly guarenteed draw will slip to every other year.
We'll all see for sure come summer when the draw odds come out.
-DallanC
I don't see a lot of people switching because of this. That said, there are units with so few ML tags issued that even 5 people switching from rifle to ML could put higher end point holders back a couple years. This very well could effect the odds on the premium units for the first couple of years, but I don't see it becoming the new trend.I was getting near the top of the LE elk pool for a unit we have family property on that has alot of bulls. I honestly think this will add on another 5 years to my wait.
-DallanC
I know 5 hunters that will be putting in for the ML hunts this coming year, and the main reason that they are doing so is because of the magnification of the scopes. Also what is so intimidating for those that have never shot one? All you have to do now is drop a couple of pellets down the barrel and ram a saboted bullet down the barrel, then place a 209 primer into the priming hole. No mess, no measuring, and no more worries about moisture.I predict no change in the ML hunts. This isn't significant enough to warrant a large change. If a scope was what shifted everyone to specific hunts the there would not be any archery hunters. With the price of ML going up over the last several years I don't think everyone is going to rush out and buy one, plus they can be intimidating to those that have never shot one. I like the fact they have allowed the scopes but this just means better shot placement.
Should there have been more discussion? Probably.The process was a joke.
I don't think some of you understand how much this can effect LE pools and max points req. Doesn't help rifle, and hurts ml.
I had no freakin idea Obama was a hunter much less a muzzle load hunter in Utah....huh crazy thing.some of you really crack me up, with the new scope regs. i thought that obama and his lib army were bad. but the people around here are much worse.
I won't defend the "process" (or lack thereof), but it is literally impossible for this to have a negative effect on the limited entry ML pool without helping the rifle. You can't apply for both here. If you're going to be switching TO one pool, you have to be coming FROM another. Dahlmer is spot on.The process was a joke.
I don't think some of you understand how much this can effect LE pools and max points req. Doesn't help rifle, and hurts ml.